Tranexamic Acid and Holding Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Morning of Surgery Do Not Decrease Transfusion Requirements in Patients Undergoing Anterior Intrapelvic Approach for Acetabular Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine factors that may affect transfusion rates for patients requiring an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach for an acetabulum fracture. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective comparison study (3 trauma centers at two urban academic centers). Patients who had an AIP approach for an acetabulum fracture without other notable same-day procedures (irrigation and débridement and/or external fixation were only other allowed procedures) were included. One hundred ninety-five adult (18 and older) patients had adequate records to complete analysis with no preexisting coagulopathy. The main outcome evaluated was the number of units transfused at the time of surgery and up to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: Factors that were found to affect intraoperative transfusion rates were older age, lower preoperative hematocrit, longer surgery duration, and requiring increased intraoperative intravenous fluids. Factors that did not affect transfusion rate included sex, body mass index, hip dislocation at the time of injury, fracture pattern, AIP approach alone or with lateral window ± distal extension, Injury Severity Score, preoperative platelet count, use of tranexamic acid, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis received morning of surgery. When followed out through the remainder of a week after surgery, the results for any factor did not change. DISCUSSION: In this large multicenter retrospective study of patients requiring an AIP approach, tranexamic acid and use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (or holding it the morning of surgery) did not affect transfusion rates either during surgery or up to a week after surgery. Older age, lower preoperative hematocrit level, longer surgery time, and increased intraoperative intravenous fluids were associated with higher transfusion rates. DATA AVAILABILITY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Data are available on request. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective case-control study.

Antibiotic Duration Following Abdominal Gunshot Injuries With Associated Pelvis or Spine Involvement: A 20-Year Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis duration following gunshot wounds (GSW) to the abdomen with an associated orthopedic fracture is unknown. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of short versus long courses of prophylactic antibiotics following penetrating hollow viscus injury with communicating orthopedic fracture. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to the trauma service over a 20-y period who sustained an abdominal GSW with hollow viscus injury and communicating spine or pelvic fractures. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on prophylactic antibiotic duration: short course (SC, ≤48 h) and long course (>48 h). The primary outcome was the incidence of osteomyelitis and meningitis up to 1-y postinjury. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and the incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridioides difficile infections. Risk factors for osteomyelitis and meningitis were determined. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were included with 45 (36%) in the SC group. Median prophylactic antibiotic durations were SC, 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-2) versus long course, 7 (IQR, 5-7) d (P < 0.001). There was no difference in osteomyelitis and meningitis incidence (2 [4.4%] versus 4 [5%], P = 0.77). Median hospital length of stay (7 [IQR, 6-11] versus 9 [IQR, 6-15] d, P = 0.072) and incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms (6 [13.3%] versus 13 [16.3%], P = 0.86) and Clostridioides difficile infections (0 [0%] versus 1 [1.3%], P = 0.77) were similar between groups. There were no independent risk factors identified for osteomyelitis or meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: A shorter course of antibiotic prophylaxis ≤48 h may be adequate following abdominal GSW that traverses a hollow viscus and results in pelvic fracture or spinal column injury.

Locked Lateral Plating Versus Retrograde Nailing for Distal Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The 2 main forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and intramedullary nailing in 64 cases. INTERVENTION: Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, bother index, EQ Health, and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, and number and type of adverse events. RESULTS: Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months after injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability, and ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired 1 year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk of Postoperative Sciatic Nerve Palsy After Posterior Acetabular Fracture Fixation: Does Patient Position Matter?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the prone or lateral position is associated with postoperative sciatic nerve palsy in posterior acetabular fracture fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients with acetabular fractures treated with a posterior approach (n = 1045). INTERVENTION: Posterior acetabular fixation in the prone or lateral positions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the prevalence of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy by position. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for nerve palsy, using multiple regression analysis and propensity scoring. RESULTS: The rate of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy was 9.5% (43/455) in the prone position and 1.5% (9/590) in the lateral position ( P < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration were significantly higher for patients who developed a postoperative sciatic nerve palsy. Subgroup analysis showed that position did not influence palsy prevalence in posterior wall fractures. For other fracture patterns, propensity score analysis demonstrated a significantly increased odds ratio of palsy in the prone position [aOR 7.14 (2.22-23.00); P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of posterior wall fracture patterns, the results of this study suggest that factors associated with increased risk for postoperative sciatic nerve palsy after a posterior approach are fractures treated in the prone position, increased blood loss, and prolonged operative duration. These risks should be considered alongside the other goals (eg, reduction quality) of acetabular fracture surgery when choosing surgical positioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An international survey of pelvic trauma surgeons on the management of pelvic ring injuries.

INTRODUCTION: There exists substantial variability in the management of pelvic ring injuries among pelvic trauma surgeons. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive survey on the management of pelvic ring injuries among an international group of pelvic trauma surgeons to determine areas of agreement and disagreement. METHODS: A 45-item questionnaire was developed using an online survey platform and distributed to 30 international pelvic trauma surgeons. The survey consisted of general questions on the acute management of pelvic ring injuries and questions regarding 5 cases: Lateral compression (LC) type 1 injury, LC-3, Anterior-posterior compression (APC) type 3 injury, a combined vertical shear (VS) injury through the sacrum, and VS injury through sacroiliac joint. Respondents were shown blinded anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and axial computed tomography (CT) images for each case and asked if the injury needed fixation, the type of fixation, the order of fixation, and postoperative weight-bearing status. The Kappa statistic was calculated to assess agreement between respondents for each question. RESULTS: Nineteen out of 30 pelvic trauma surgeons completed the survey. Respondents practiced in Brazil (n = 1), Germany (n = 1), India (n = 1), Italy (n = 1) United Kingdom (n = 1), and the United States (n = 14). Of the 45 questions in this survey, 38 (84%) had minimal to no agreement among the respondents. There was moderate agreement, for performing lumbopelvic fixation when indicated, for anterior and posterior fixation of the LC-3 injury, and on forgoing EUA or stress X-rays for the APC-3 injury. There was strong agreement for open reduction and internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring in the APC-3 injury and the VS injury through the SI joint. In contrast, LC-1 injury and combined VS pelvic ring injury through the sacrum had no areas of moderate to strong agreement. DISCUSSION: This study identified specific areas of pelvic ring injury management with minimal to no agreement among pelvic trauma surgeons. Future research should target these areas with a lack of agreement to decrease practice variability and improve patient outcomes.

Validated Radiographic Scoring System for Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvis Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a radiographic fracture scoring system for lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) pelvic fractures based on OTA/AO survey data and to preliminarily evaluate this system within an LC-1 pelvis fracture cohort. DESIGN: Survey study with validation patient cohort. SETTING: Two Level 1 academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Attendings (n=111) at the 2013 OTA/AO national meeting reviewed imaging from 27 LC-1 fractures and indicated surgical recommendations ("yes/no"). A separate LC-1 fracture cohort (33 patients) was used to evaluate the scoring system. INTERVENTION: The LC-1 scoring system (range: 5-14) based on radiographic morphology of sacral, superior ramus (SR), and inferior ramus (IR) fracture components. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Numeric scores were compared against (1) OTA/AO attendees' operative recommendations and (2) LC-1 cohort treatment and outcomes. RESULTS: Operative tendency of OTA/AO survey respondents-defined as the percent of "yes" responses to recommend surgical stabilization-was highly correlated with radiographic findings: sacral displacement {odds ratio (OR) = 18.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.7-30.6]}; sacral column 2-3 versus 1 [OR = 5.7 (95% CI: 3.9-8.3)]; Denis classification [OR = 10 (95% CI: 6.7-14.9); IR displacement OR = 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-4.8)]; and SR fracture [OR = 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3-2.8)]. Total scores <7 were 81% accurate in predicting nonoperative treatment. Total scores >9 were 89% accurate in predicting an operative recommendation. In the LC-1 cohort, scoring accuracy was 100% (95% CI: 85%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on survey results and patient cohort data, scores <7 predict nonoperative treatment recommendation, scores >9 indicate surgical recommendations, and scores 7-9 indicate indeterminate stability that should be further evaluated.

Heterotopic Ossification in Acetabular Fracture Surgery.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication of the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. HO is the formation of trabecular bone in soft tissues where bone does not usually occur. Over the last decade, many risk factors have been identified for HO after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures; however, prophylaxis and treatment of this condition are controversial. Potential preventive measures range from NSAIDs to external beam irradiation, but recent studies have questioned the utility of these measures. The Brooker classification system, which has been correlated with patient function and outcomes, is most commonly used to describe HO severity. Advances will assist in the diagnosis, prevention, and management of HO as well as the assessment of risk factors that could affect outcomes.

Seasonal variations in posttraumatic wound infections after open extremity fractures.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of the orthopedic trauma literature has dealt with risk of infection as a function of time to debridement and severity of open fracture. The goal of this analysis was to determine if either the incidence or causative organism of posttraumatic infection varies with the season in which the open fracture occurred. No such study has been previously published. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of all skeletally mature patients sustaining an open fracture of either the upper or the lower extremity long bones from 2007 to 2012. Charts were reviewed to extract information regarding date of injury, Gustilo-Anderson grade of open fracture, Injury Severity Score (ISS), time to surgical debridement, any posttraumatic wound infection (deep or superficial), and the causative organisms. Patients were placed into one of four groups based on the time of year: spring (March to May), summer (June to August), fall (September to November), and winter (December to February). Patients were excluded if they were skeletally immature, smokers, or also diagnosed with a condition that would increase risk of infection. Statistical analysis was performed to assess whether any observed differences were of significance. RESULTS: All four groups were similar with respect to Gustilo grade, ISS, and time to surgical debridement. A total of 1,128 open fractures were treated between 2007 and 2012. There were 58 total infections for an overall incidence of 4.3%. The incidence of infection based on season was 6.0% for spring, 4.9% for summer, 2.8% for fall, and 3.6% for winter (p < 0.05). The incidence of infection was 5.5% for spring and summer combined and 3.9% for winter and fall combined (p < 0.05). Gram-positive organisms were more prevalent in the spring and summer seasons (p < 0.05). Although gram-negative organisms were cultured more commonly in the fall and winter seasons (52%) compared with the spring and summer seasons (36%), they were evenly distributed with gram-positive organisms during the winter and fall. CONCLUSION: A seasonal variation exists regarding the incidence of infection and causative organisms for posttraumatic wound infection following open extremity fractures. The incidence of infection is significantly higher in the spring and summer months with a preponderance of gram-positive organisms. Patients with infection after injuries sustained in the fall and winter months are more likely to have a Gustilo Grade 3 injury and gram-negative bacteria as the causative organism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Delayed presentation of bladder entrapment secondary to nonoperative treatment of a lateral compression pelvic fracture.

Entrapment of the bladder secondary to pelvic fracture is infrequently described in the literature. Entrapment has most commonly been found to occur through the actions of internal or external fixation. This case report presents bladder entrapment that was not detected until the patient developed genitourinary symptoms and dyspareunia 8 months after nonoperative treatment of a stable lateral compression pelvic fracture.